"Everything is reduced down to your value system. If you think "institutional racism" is okay under any circumstances, you are doomed to live a political society where races compete for special privileges."

Given that it bears no resemblance to what I said, I don't know where to go with it. I was talking about systemic racism, which is different.

"If your moral compass says government as noted in the 14th Amendment has been charged by the people to prevent such unequal treatment of US citizens"

My compass does, very much so. But that's not what we have, nor have we ever had that. A fair number of Americans still don't believe in equality and are actively working to prevent it. One of our political parties has defined itself by opposing rights for non-Christian and LGBTQ+ Americans in particular.

"you believe a higher authority than government has established that all humans have unalienable equal human rights (not to be confused with other rights)."

Whoopsie. Now you've put in a God? Do I only deserve equality if I follow the right higher authority?

"Then corrupt governments will never have a moral right to exist (hence the argument America used when it declared its independence)."

That would be the country founded on Black people as farm implements, genocide of the indigenous population, and women who couldn't vote.

Every government is immoral to someone, who decides? Slavery is written into the Constitution. In modern times, I think what the Republican Party promotes is immoral, but they think I am. Who's right? They want to win at all costs because they believe losing is the end of the nation and are willing to destroy it to save it. Is that moral?

"Bottomline, if you try to try to argue two wrong make a right,"

I'm not arguing that at all. I'm saying that some people have been systematically discriminated against in such a way that even if we reached equality tomorrow, that long-term discrimination would continue to have effects for generations to come. Do we just ignore that?

"instead of what's right is right and what's wrong is wrong,"

What's right and what's wrong? Please, tell me. It's an incredibly complicated question you've glossed over.

"you are doomed to repeat the human right abuses of history."

Actually, trying very much not to - and part of that is acknowledging the mistakes of the past.

Do you see why I find your thought process too simplistic and based on questionable assumptions?