Case in point, the edifices of slavery we’re all occupied by Democrats. Go back and research a little before bloviating, try a little balance, and probably wait till you graduate to take on the more complex debates of humanity.

I’ve been through three university graduations, and at this point there’s unlikely to be a fourth. But thanks for the confidence(?)

I was trying to sort out your first paragraph, but then I got to the second and realized I wasn’t going to be able to get through. It is, however, a near-perfect example of how bad science works.

The edifices of slavery we’re all occupied by Democrats.

This is questionable, given that you can’t reasonably compare parties across centuries.

It is true that the Democrats were the party of racism for the first half of the 20th century. But you lost the scientific method by stopping there and refusing to gather more data, meaning you didn’t get useful results.

In the 1940s and ’50s, urban Democrats began reaching out to non-white voters. This led to the Civil Rights Act in 1964, and a few decades later, the congressional map was turned on its head. The districts formerly represented by racist Democrats flipped to Republican, and now ~90% of Black Americans are Democrats. The GOP, on the other hand, is stunningly monolithic — in a very diverse country, Republicans are almost entirely white. (And almost entirely Christian, with something like 75% being both.)

I have no idea why people still throw around the “Democrats are racist now because they used to be” nonsense, given how little sense it makes and how easy it is to refute. Just ideology, I suppose, believing whatever supports the cause, be it true or not.